Rather than me going and reading through articles suggested by Scour, I would be curious what an LLM-generated digest would look like.
Here are my thoughts:
Instead of a boring system prompt like “summarize these articles”, let’s make it more personal, for example: “You are @justmoon’s work colleague and friend and you are obsessed with following the latest tech news. You know that @justmoon cares about these interests: [interests]. Read the following posts carefully and think about which ones @justmoon may find interesting and why.”
The focus should be on surfacing (scouring for) hidden nuggets that might otherwise get lost in the noise, not just summarizing the “most important” news.
The digest would not be intended to replace reading the articles but merely providing a more streamlined discovery experience.
Therefore, the digest should focus on the “why it’s interesting” and not the “what it contains”
Ideally, the assistant would know roughly what I know and don’t know. For example, it would know my proficiency level with different technologies.
You can think of this as a second processing layer on top of the basic relevance layer. I.e. the current Scour is there to narrow down the millions of articles written every day to a few hundred and then this step narrows it down to the top ten that I’m actually going to read.
That’s a great suggestion! I’ll play around with something like that and see what it looks like